Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charles Knapp's avatar

As the ad included a reference to eggs, the pun-sphere expands accordingly.

Just as the media accepts at face value the excuse given for any number of vile comments as having been “taken out of context” - never asking the obvious follow-up “in what context would such a statement be acceptable?” - so too comments based on antisemitic tropes are laundered through the “critique of Israel” deflection - never asking what specifically is being criticized.

What strikes me as a rather basic journalistic obligation would be to explain to the audience how the price of bananas and eggs in this case are linked specifically to US aid.

That this ad also opens the door to a (long overdue) journalistic examination into the accuracy of the charges of “genocide”, “ethnic cleansing” - you would think these would be mutually exclusive - and the all-purpose “IDF targets kids” canard.

But as the media does not seem up to an honest report on this despicable ad, it’s clearly a bridge too far for it to debunk the other libels.

Meanwhile, keep fighting the good fight on behalf of quality journalism. Democracies can only survive when the people have solid information.

For what it’s worth, I found this book illuminating.

https://journalism.columbia.edu/content/not-exactly-lying

No posts

Ready for more?